The Senator Sharafadeen Alli Campaign Organisation (SSACO) has condemned allegations that commercial transport operators in Oyo State are being compelled to purchase campaign stickers and posters associated with the Allied Peoples Movement (APM) candidate, Bimbo Adekanmbi, and other political figures.
The organisation described the alleged practice as an infringement on democratic freedom, arguing that commercial drivers should not be subjected to intimidation or financial pressure over political campaign materials.
In a statement issued on Wednesday, SSACO’s Director of Media and Publicity, Bisi Oladele, accused the leadership of the Park Management System (PMS) of allegedly imposing compulsory purchases on commercial transport operators.
The organisation said information available to it suggested that drivers operating commercial minibuses, popularly known as micras, alongside tricycle riders, taxi operators and interstate bus drivers, were being pressured to obtain campaign stickers and posters reportedly priced at ₦15,000.
The allegations have raised questions about the relationship between transport management structures and political mobilisation, particularly as parties and candidates begin preparing for future elections.
SSACO argued that political participation should be based on voluntary support rather than coercion. It maintained that transport operators should be free to decide whether to display campaign materials or associate themselves with a particular candidate or political party.
Commercial drivers depend on their vehicles for their livelihoods and often face substantial operating expenses, including fuel, maintenance, levies and other charges. Any additional financial demands, if compulsory, could place further pressure on their earnings.
The allegations also touch on broader questions about the conduct of political campaigns and the protection of citizens’ rights to political choice.
However, the claims remain allegations made by the campaign organisation. The information provided does not establish whether the Park Management System issued such directives, whether any drivers were compelled to make payments or whether the alleged practice was authorised by the APM candidate.
The response of the PMS leadership and the individuals or groups associated with the campaign materials would be important in determining the circumstances surrounding the allegations.
As political activities gather momentum, the controversy underscores the need for transparent campaign practices that respect the freedom of citizens to support or reject candidates without intimidation.