Controversial cleric says ransom payments help sustain terrorists but insists dialogue remains the only path to peace
Controversial Islamic cleric, Sheikh Ahmad Gumi, has once again triggered nationwide debate after defending negotiations with terrorists and armed bandits operating across Nigeria.
Gumi reportedly argued that many terrorist groups rely heavily on kidnapping ransom payments to sustain their operations and survive in the forests. The cleric maintained that despite public criticism, dialogue and negotiation remain necessary tools for ending bloodshed and reducing attacks in affected communities.
The Kaduna-based scholar, who has repeatedly positioned himself as an intermediary between government authorities and armed groups, insisted that negotiation with terrorists is not unusual globally. According to him, countries facing prolonged insurgencies often explore dialogue channels alongside military action.
Gumi’s comments have, however, sparked fresh outrage on social media, with many Nigerians accusing him of appearing sympathetic toward terrorists at a time insecurity continues to devastate several northern communities. Critics argue that ransom payments and negotiations may indirectly strengthen criminal groups by providing them with financial resources and legitimacy.
Over the years, the cleric has remained one of the most controversial voices in Nigeria’s security conversation, especially because of his repeated meetings with armed groups in forests and remote locations. He has consistently defended those engagements, claiming security agencies are aware of and sometimes involved in the negotiation efforts.
The debate over whether Nigeria should negotiate with terrorists continues to divide public opinion. While some believe dialogue may save lives and secure the release of abducted victims, others insist that paying ransom only fuels more kidnappings and strengthens terror networks across the country.