Minister of Works David Umahi has defended the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway, accusing critics of being motivated by envy over President Bola Tinubu’s infrastructure achievements.
Minister of Works David Umahi has criticised those questioning the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway project being undertaken by the President Bola Ahmed Tinubu administration.
Umahi said some of the criticism against the project was motivated by jealousy over what he described as the achievements of the Tinubu administration.
The minister maintained that the Federal Government remains committed to completing the approximately 700-kilometre coastal highway.
Umahi Defends Tinubu’s Infrastructure Drive
The Works Minister said critics of the project had failed to properly appreciate the significance of the infrastructure being developed.
Umahi argued that the project would have significant economic and transportation benefits once completed.
He also dismissed claims that criticism of the project was based solely on legitimate concerns, saying some opponents were motivated by envy.
Lagos-Calabar Highway Remains Controversial
The coastal highway has generated significant public debate since construction began.
Questions have been raised over its cost, route, environmental implications, project design and the use of public resources.
The government has consistently defended the project, arguing that it will improve transportation links, stimulate economic activity and connect communities along Nigeria’s coastline.
Government Promises Completion
Umahi reaffirmed the Federal Government’s commitment to delivering the project.
The highway is planned to run through several states along Nigeria’s coastline and is expected to improve connectivity between Lagos and the South-South region.
The minister said the administration remains determined to deliver the project despite criticism.
Why the Project Matters
If completed as planned, the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway could become one of Nigeria’s major transport infrastructure projects.
However, questions surrounding its financing, implementation, environmental impact and value for money remain part of the public debate.