ADC presidential candidate questions whether concerns over US legal history influenced President’s decision
Former Vice President and African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar, has questioned President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s decision to miss the 81st United Nations General Assembly in New York for the third consecutive year.
Atiku raised the issue in a statement issued on Sunday by his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu, following confirmation that Vice President Kashim Shettima would lead Nigeria’s delegation to the international gathering.
Atiku raises comparison involving Maduro
Atiku reportedly questioned whether Tinubu was concerned about facing potential treatment similar to that experienced by Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro under the administration of US President Donald Trump.
The statement appears to link the question to concerns surrounding Tinubu’s past legal history in the United States. However, the claim that such concerns influenced the President’s decision to remain in Nigeria has not been independently established.
There is no verified evidence in the information reviewed that Tinubu’s absence resulted from a US legal restriction or that the President faced a confirmed risk of being treated in the manner suggested by Atiku’s comparison.
Shettima to represent Nigeria
Vice President Kashim Shettima has been directed to lead Nigeria’s delegation to the 81st UNGA.
The United Nations General Assembly provides an important platform for heads of government and senior officials to discuss international security, economic cooperation, investment, development and diplomatic relations.
Atiku’s criticism forms part of the political contest ahead of the 2027 elections. The Presidency’s explanation for Tinubu’s absence would provide additional context regarding the decision to delegate representation to the Vice President.
The allegations and questions raised by Atiku should be understood as political commentary unless supported by independently verifiable evidence.